3 304 vs A8-7600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-7600
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.85

Core 3 304 outperforms A8-7600 by a whopping 235% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22901347
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data8.21
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency1.19no data
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesIntel
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Wildcat Lake (2026)
Release date31 July 2014 (11 years ago)16 April 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$309

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of A8-7600 and Core 3 304: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)5 (Penta-Core)
Threads45
Base clock speed3.1 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache256 KB192 KB
L2 cache4096 KB2.5 MB
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm3 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on A8-7600 and Core 3 304 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+Intel BGA 1516
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7600 and Core 3 304. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

A8-7600 and Core 3 304 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7600 and Core 3 304 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7600 and Core 3 304. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR5, LPDDR5X
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsIntel Xe3 Graphics (1 Xe)
iGPU core count6no data
จำนวนพาธไลน์384no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-7600 and Core 3 304 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-7600 and Core 3 304 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-7600 and Core 3 304.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes166

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A8-7600 1.85
Core 3 304 6.19
+235%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A8-7600 3205
Samples: 1957
Core 3 304 10708
+234%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.85 6.19
Recency 31 July 2014 16 April 2026
Physical cores 4 5
Threads 4 5
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Core 3 304 has a 235% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 25% more physical cores and 25% more threads, a 833% more advanced lithography process, and 333% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core 3 304 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A8-7600 in performance tests.

Note that A8-7600 is a desktop processor while Core 3 304 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 393 votes

Rate A8-7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 238 votes

Rate Core 3 304 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A8-7600 and Core 3 304, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.