Phenom II X4 905e vs A8-7410

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-7410
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.77
+41.6%

A8-7410 outperforms Phenom II X4 905e by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-7410 and Phenom II X4 905e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19312215
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.76
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Series4x Phenom II (Desktop)
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)Daneb (2009)
Release date7 May 2015 (9 years ago)1 June 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$212
Current price$415 $35 (0.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A8-7410 and Phenom II X4 905e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.5 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data258 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors930 Million758 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A8-7410 and Phenom II X4 905e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4AM3
Power consumption (TDP)12 - 25 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7410 and Phenom II X4 905e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT, AMD-V45 nm, 1.25
AES-NI+no data
FMAFMA4no data
AVX+no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7410 and Phenom II X4 905e are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7410 and Phenom II X4 905e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1866DDR3
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 Graphicsno data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-7410 and Phenom II X4 905e integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-7410 and Phenom II X4 905e integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-7410 and Phenom II X4 905e.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-7410 1.77
+41.6%
Phenom II X4 905e 1.25

A8-7410 outperforms Phenom II X4 905e by 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A8-7410 2741
+41.6%
Phenom II X4 905e 1936

A8-7410 outperforms Phenom II X4 905e by 42% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A8-7410 241
Phenom II X4 905e 341
+41.5%

Phenom II X4 905e outperforms A8-7410 by 41% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A8-7410 633
Phenom II X4 905e 1150
+81.7%

Phenom II X4 905e outperforms A8-7410 by 82% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A8-7410 1917
Phenom II X4 905e 2290
+19.5%

Phenom II X4 905e outperforms A8-7410 by 19% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A8-7410 4665
Phenom II X4 905e 8241
+76.7%

Phenom II X4 905e outperforms A8-7410 by 77% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A8-7410 27
Phenom II X4 905e 15.1
+78.8%

A8-7410 outperforms Phenom II X4 905e by 79% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A8-7410 2
Phenom II X4 905e 3
+59.4%

Phenom II X4 905e outperforms A8-7410 by 59% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A8-7410 174
Phenom II X4 905e 255
+46.6%

Phenom II X4 905e outperforms A8-7410 by 47% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A8-7410 52
Phenom II X4 905e 64
+23.1%

Phenom II X4 905e outperforms A8-7410 by 23% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

A8-7410 0.61
Phenom II X4 905e 0.76
+24.6%

Phenom II X4 905e outperforms A8-7410 by 25% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A8-7410 1
+138%
Phenom II X4 905e 0.4

A8-7410 outperforms Phenom II X4 905e by 138% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A8-7410 1292
Phenom II X4 905e 2018
+56.2%

Phenom II X4 905e outperforms A8-7410 by 56% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A8-7410 10
Phenom II X4 905e 17
+77.1%

Phenom II X4 905e outperforms A8-7410 by 77% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A8-7410 46
Phenom II X4 905e 88
+92.2%

Phenom II X4 905e outperforms A8-7410 by 92% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.77 1.25
Recency 7 May 2015 1 June 2009
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 65 Watt

The A8-7410 is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X4 905e in performance tests.

Be aware that A8-7410 is a notebook processor while Phenom II X4 905e is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-7410 and Phenom II X4 905e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-7410
A8-7410
AMD Phenom II X4 905e
Phenom II X4 905e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 633 votes

Rate A8-7410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 26 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 905e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-7410 or Phenom II X4 905e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.