i5-4400E vs A8-7410

VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-7410
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.73
Core i5-4400E
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 37 Watt
2.05
+18.5%

Core i5-4400E outperforms A8-7410 by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-7410 and Core i5-4400E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20331897
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Core i5
Power efficiency6.555.24
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date7 May 2015 (9 years ago)1 October 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$266

Detailed specifications

A8-7410 and Core i5-4400E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache2048 KB512 KB
L3 cacheno data3 MB
Chip lithography28 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data130 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors930 Million960 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A8-7410 and Core i5-4400E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP4FCBGA1364
Power consumption (TDP)12 - 25 Watt37 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7410 and Core i5-4400E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT, AMD-Vno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7410 and Core i5-4400E are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7410 and Core i5-4400E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1866DDR3
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R5 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics 4600
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-7410 and Core i5-4400E integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-7410 and Core i5-4400E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-7410 and Core i5-4400E.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-7410 1.73
i5-4400E 2.05
+18.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-7410 2741
i5-4400E 3251
+18.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.73 2.05
Recency 7 May 2015 1 October 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 37 Watt

A8-7410 has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores, and 208.3% lower power consumption.

i5-4400E, on the other hand, has a 18.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i5-4400E is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-7410 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-7410 and Core i5-4400E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-7410
A8-7410
Intel Core i5-4400E
Core i5-4400E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 696 votes

Rate A8-7410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 21 vote

Rate Core i5-4400E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-7410 or Core i5-4400E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.