A8-6500T vs A8-7410

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-7410
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.57
+38.9%

A8-7410 outperforms A8-6500T by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23542633
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency4.421.06
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date7 May 2015 (11 years ago)16 September 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of A8-7410 and A8-6500T: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.1 GHz
L1 cacheno data192 KB
L2 cache2048 KB4096 KB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data71 °C
Number of transistors930 Million1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A8-7410 and A8-6500T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4FM2
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7410 and A8-6500T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT, AMD-Vno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4+
AVX++
PowerNow++
PowerGating++
VirusProtect++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7410 and A8-6500T are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7410 and A8-6500T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1866DDR3-1866
Max memory channels12

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 GraphicsAMD Radeon™ HD 8550D
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data256
Enduro++
Switchable graphics++
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-7410 and A8-6500T integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-7410 and A8-6500T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 11
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-7410 and A8-6500T.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A8-7410 1.57
+38.9%
A8-6500T 1.13

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A8-7410 2741
+38.2%
Samples: 1472
A8-6500T 1983
Samples: 10

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.57 1.13
Recency 7 May 2015 16 September 2013
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

A8-7410 has a 39% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 14% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The AMD A8-7410 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A8-6500T in performance tests.

Be aware that A8-7410 is a notebook processor while A8-6500T is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 775 votes

Rate A8-7410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 9 votes

Rate A8-6500T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A8-7410 and A8-6500T, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.