Atom Z670 vs A8-7200P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-7200P
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.23
+1267%

A8-7200P outperforms Atom Z670 by a whopping 1267% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25653709
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD KaveriIntel Atom
Power efficiency1.481.27
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Lincroft (2010−2011)
Release date4 June 2014 (11 years ago)11 April 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$75

Detailed specifications

A8-7200P and Atom Z670 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus typeno datacDMI
Bus rateno data400 MT/s
Multiplierno data8
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size245 mm265 mm2
Maximum core temperature102 °C90 °C
Number of transistors2410 Million140 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A8-7200P and Atom Z670 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP3T-PBGA518
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt3 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7200P and Atom Z670. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

A8-7200P and Atom Z670 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7200P and Atom Z670 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7200P and Atom Z670. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR2
Maximum memory sizeno data2.93 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidthno data3.2 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 GraphicsPowerVR SGX535
iGPU core count4no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-7200P and Atom Z670 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
LVDSno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-7200P and Atom Z670 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-7200P and Atom Z670.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI supportno data-

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A8-7200P 1.23
+1267%
Atom Z670 0.09

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A8-7200P 2158
+1266%
Samples: 20
Atom Z670 158
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.23 0.09
Recency 4 June 2014 11 April 2011
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 3 Watt

A8-7200P has a 1266.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

Atom Z670, on the other hand, has 1066.7% lower power consumption.

The AMD A8-7200P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom Z670 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-7200P
A8-7200P
Intel Atom Z670
Atom Z670

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 5 votes

Rate A8-7200P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 4 votes

Rate Atom Z670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A8-7200P and Atom Z670, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.