A6-7310 vs A8-7200P

VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-7200P
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.36
A6-7310
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.69
+24.3%

A6-7310 outperforms A8-7200P by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-7200P and A6-7310 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22542061
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD KaveriAMD A-Series
Power efficiency3.686.40
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Carrizo-L (2015)
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)7 May 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-7200P and A6-7310 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz2.4 GHz
L2 cache4096 KB2048 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature102 °C90 °C
Number of transistors2410 Million930 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A8-7200P and A6-7310 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP3FP4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt12-25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7200P and A6-7310. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT
AES-NI++
FMA+FMA4
AVX++
FRTC+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow++
PowerGating++
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect++
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7200P and A6-7310 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7200P and A6-7310. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR3L-1866
Max memory channels21

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R5 GraphicsAMD Radeon R4 Graphics
iGPU core count4no data
Enduro++
Switchable graphics++
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-7200P and A6-7310 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-7200P and A6-7310 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Vulkan++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-7200P and A6-7310.

PCIe version3.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-7200P 1.36
A6-7310 1.69
+24.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-7200P 2154
A6-7310 2689
+24.8%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A8-7200P 379
+66.2%
A6-7310 228

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A8-7200P 1020
+72.3%
A6-7310 592

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.36 1.69
Recency 4 June 2014 7 May 2015
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 12 Watt

A6-7310 has a 24.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and 191.7% lower power consumption.

The A6-7310 is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-7200P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-7200P and A6-7310, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-7200P
A8-7200P
AMD A6-7310
A6-7310

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 5 votes

Rate A8-7200P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 513 votes

Rate A6-7310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-7200P or A6-7310, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.