Xeon D-1622 vs A8-6600K
Aggregate performance score
Xeon D-1622 outperforms A8-6600K by a whopping 106% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2190 | 1630 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.31 | 5.27 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD A-Series (Desktop) | Intel Xeon D |
| Power efficiency | 0.72 | 3.73 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Richland (2013−2014) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| Release date | 1 June 2013 (12 years ago) | 2 April 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $142 | $170 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon D-1622 has 1600% better value for money than A8-6600K.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
A8-6600K and Xeon D-1622 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 2.0 |
| Multiplier | no data | 26 |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 6 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | 246.24 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 74 °C | 105 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | 3200 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on A8-6600K and Xeon D-1622 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FM2 | FCBGA1667 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 40 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-6600K and Xeon D-1622. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | FMA4 | - |
| AVX | AVX | + |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| PowerGating | + | - |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| GPIO | no data | + |
| AMT | no data | SPS 3.0 |
| Quiet System | no data | - |
Security technologies
A8-6600K and Xeon D-1622 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-6600K and Xeon D-1622 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
| IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-6600K and Xeon D-1622. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1866 | DDR4, DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 34.124 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 8570D | no data |
| จำนวนพาธไลน์ | 256 | no data |
| Enduro | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
| UVD | + | - |
| VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A8-6600K and Xeon D-1622 integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A8-6600K and Xeon D-1622 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | DirectX® 11 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-6600K and Xeon D-1622.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0/3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 32 |
| USB revision | no data | 2.0/3.0 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 6 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 8 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | - |
| UART | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.71 | 3.53 |
| Recency | 1 June 2013 | 2 April 2019 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 40 Watt |
Xeon D-1622 has a 106.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.
The Intel Xeon D-1622 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A8-6600K in performance tests.
Note that A8-6600K is a desktop processor while Xeon D-1622 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
