3020e vs A8-6600K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-6600K
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
1.95
+23.4%

A8-6600K outperforms 3020e by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-6600K and 3020e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18662015
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.47no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Dali (Zen)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)4 August 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$142no data
Current price$67 (0.5x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A8-6600K and 3020e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.9 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cache192 KB192 KB
L2 cache4096 KB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature74 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on A8-6600K and 3020e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFM2FT5
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-6600K and 3020e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR4-2400, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI1+
FMAFMA4+
AVXAVX+
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-6600K and 3020e are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-6600K and 3020e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR4
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8570DAMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Number of pipelines256no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-6600K and 3020e integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-6600K and 3020e integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-6600K and 3020e.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-6600K 1.95
+23.4%
3020e 1.58

A8-6600K outperforms 3020e by 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A8-6600K 3014
+23.3%
3020e 2445

A8-6600K outperforms 3020e by 23% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A8-6600K 458
3020e 656
+43.2%

3020e outperforms A8-6600K by 43% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A8-6600K 1106
+1.6%
3020e 1089

A8-6600K outperforms 3020e by 2% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A8-6600K 17.9
+62%
3020e 29

3020e outperforms A8-6600K by 62% in wPrime 32.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A8-6600K 1.9
+72.7%
3020e 1.1

A8-6600K outperforms 3020e by 73% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A8-6600K 2595
+111%
3020e 1232

A8-6600K outperforms 3020e by 111% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A8-6600K 22
+73.4%
3020e 13

A8-6600K outperforms 3020e by 73% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A8-6600K 106
+62.3%
3020e 65

A8-6600K outperforms 3020e by 62% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.95 1.58
Integrated graphics card 1.15 2.98
Recency 1 June 2013 4 August 2020
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 6 Watt

The A8-6600K is our recommended choice as it beats the 3020e in performance tests.

Note that A8-6600K is a desktop processor while 3020e is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-6600K and 3020e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-6600K
A8-6600K
AMD 3020e
3020e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 425 votes

Rate A8-6600K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 776 votes

Rate 3020e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-6600K or 3020e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.