Atom D425 vs A8-6500

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A8-6500 and Atom D425 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1894not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.34no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Pineview (2009−2011)
Release date1 June 2013 (10 years ago)21 June 2010 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$993
Current price$58 $85 (0.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A8-6500 and Atom D425 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz1.83 GHz
L1 cache192 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size246 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million123 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A8-6500 and Atom D425 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-6500 and Atom D425. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI1-
FMAFMA4no data
AVXAVXno data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data-
Thermal Monitoringno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

A8-6500 and Atom D425 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-6500 and Atom D425 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-6500 and Atom D425. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8570DIntel GMA 3150
Number of pipelines256no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-6500 and Atom D425 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-6500 and Atom D425 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-6500 and Atom D425.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A8-6500 2820
+1317%
Atom D425 199

A8-6500 outperforms Atom D425 by 1317% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 1.14
Recency 1 June 2013 21 June 2010
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 10 Watt

We couldn't decide between A8-6500 and Atom D425. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that A8-6500 is a desktop processor while Atom D425 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-6500 and Atom D425, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-6500
A8-6500
Intel Atom D425
Atom D425

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 93 votes

Rate A8-6500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 62 votes

Rate Atom D425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-6500 or Atom D425, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.