Apple M1 Max vs A8-6500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-6500
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.82

Apple M1 Max outperforms A8-6500 by a whopping 546% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-6500 and Apple M1 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1918621
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.34no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M-Series
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)no data
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)18 October 2021 (2 years ago)
Current price$58 $8.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A8-6500 and Apple M1 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads410
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.06 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3.22 GHz
L1 cache192 KB2.9 MB
L2 cache4096 KB28 MB
L3 cache0 KB48 MB
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million57000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A8-6500 and Apple M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFM2no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-6500 and Apple M1 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI1no data
FMAFMA4no data
AVXAVXno data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-6500 and Apple M1 Max are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-6500 and Apple M1 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8570DApple M1 Max 32-Core GPU
Number of pipelines256no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-6500 and Apple M1 Max integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-6500 and Apple M1 Max integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-6500 and Apple M1 Max.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-6500 1.82
Apple M1 Max 11.75
+546%

Apple M1 Max outperforms A8-6500 by 546% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A8-6500 2817
Apple M1 Max 22040
+682%

Apple M1 Max outperforms A8-6500 by 682% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.82 11.75
Recency 1 June 2013 18 October 2021
Physical cores 4 10
Threads 4 10
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm

The Apple M1 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-6500 in performance tests.

Note that A8-6500 is a desktop processor while Apple M1 Max is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-6500 and Apple M1 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-6500
A8-6500
Apple M1 Max
M1 Max

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 95 votes

Rate A8-6500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 672 votes

Rate Apple M1 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-6500 or Apple M1 Max, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.