A6-6420K vs A8-6500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-6500
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.82
+78.4%

A8-6500 outperforms A6-6420K by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-6500 and A6-6420K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19182357
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.34no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)January 2014 (10 years ago)
Current price$58 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A8-6500 and A6-6420K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.5 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache192 KB96 KB
L2 cache4096 KB1024 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °C70 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °C70 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on A8-6500 and A6-6420K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2FM2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-6500 and A6-6420K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI1+
FMAFMA4+
AVXAVX+
PowerTune--
TrueAudio--
PowerNow++
PowerGating++
Out-of-band client management--
VirusProtect++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-6500 and A6-6420K are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-6500 and A6-6420K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR3-1866
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8570DAMD Radeon HD 8470D
Number of pipelines256192
Enduro++
Switchable graphics11
UVD++
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-6500 and A6-6420K integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-6500 and A6-6420K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11DirectX® 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-6500 and A6-6420K.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-6500 1.82
+78.4%
A6-6420K 1.02

A8-6500 outperforms A6-6420K by 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A8-6500 2817
+78.7%
A6-6420K 1576

A8-6500 outperforms A6-6420K by 79% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A8-6500 439
A6-6420K 478
+8.9%

A6-6420K outperforms A8-6500 by 9% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A8-6500 1041
+35%
A6-6420K 771

A8-6500 outperforms A6-6420K by 35% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.82 1.02
Integrated graphics card 1.15 0.94
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2

The A8-6500 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-6420K in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-6500 and A6-6420K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-6500
A8-6500
AMD A6-6420K
A6-6420K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 95 votes

Rate A8-6500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 5 votes

Rate A6-6420K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-6500 or A6-6420K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.