Core i5-1350P vs A8-6410
Aggregate performance score
i5-1350P outperforms A8-6410 by a whopping 981% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing A8-6410 and Core i5-1350P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2325 | 592 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD A-Series | Intel Raptor Lake-P |
| Architecture codename | Beema (2014) | Raptor Lake-P |
| Release date | 1 June 2014 (10 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $320 |
Detailed specifications
A8-6410 and Core i5-1350P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 1.1 MB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 10 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 18 MB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 930 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on A8-6410 and Core i5-1350P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA769 | FCBGA1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-6410 and Core i5-1350P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
Security technologies
A8-6410 and Core i5-1350P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-6410 and Core i5-1350P are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-6410 and Core i5-1350P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L) | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-6410 and Core i5-1350P.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i5-1350P outperforms A8-6410 by 981% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 65%
Core i5-1350P outperforms A8-6410 by 985% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.15 | 12.43 |
| Integrated graphics card | 1.08 | 7.43 |
| Recency | 1 June 2014 | 4 January 2022 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 12 |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 28 Watt |
A8-6410 has 86.7% lower power consumption.
i5-1350P, on the other hand, has a 980.9% higher aggregate performance score, 588% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 7 years, 200% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
The Core i5-1350P is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-6410 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between A8-6410 and Core i5-1350P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
