Atom N435 vs A8-6410

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-6410
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.12
+1020%
Atom N435
2011
1 core / 2 threads, 5 Watt
0.10

A8-6410 outperforms Atom N435 by a whopping 1020% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-6410 and Atom N435 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24103386
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAtom
Power efficiency7.071.89
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)Pinetrail (2009−2011)
Release date1 June 2014 (10 years ago)2 June 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-6410 and Atom N435 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.33 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L2 cache2048 KB512 KB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors930 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A8-6410 and Atom N435 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFT3bFCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-6410 and Atom N435. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTno data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-6410 and Atom N435 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-6410 and Atom N435. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1866DDR2, DDR3
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 Graphicsno data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-6410 and Atom N435 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-6410 and Atom N435 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-6410 and Atom N435.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-6410 1.12
+1020%
Atom N435 0.10

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-6410 1774
+1059%
Atom N435 153

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.12 0.10
Recency 1 June 2014 2 June 2011
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 5 Watt

A8-6410 has a 1020% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

Atom N435, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.

The A8-6410 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom N435 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-6410 and Atom N435, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-6410
A8-6410
Intel Atom N435
Atom N435

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 324 votes

Rate A8-6410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 31 vote

Rate Atom N435 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-6410 or Atom N435, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.