Athlon 64 FX-60 vs A8-6410

Aggregate performance score

A8-6410
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.12
+149%
Athlon 64 FX-60
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 110 Watt
0.45

A8-6410 outperforms Athlon 64 FX-60 by a whopping 149% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-6410 and Athlon 64 FX-60 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23962936
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency7.070.39
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)Toledo (2006)
Release date1 June 2014 (10 years ago)January 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-6410 and Athlon 64 FX-60 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache2048 KB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data199 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors930 Million233 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A8-6410 and Athlon 64 FX-60 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT3b939
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt110 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-6410 and Athlon 64 FX-60. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTno data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-6410 and Athlon 64 FX-60 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-6410 and Athlon 64 FX-60. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1866no data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 Graphicsno data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-6410 and Athlon 64 FX-60 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-6410 and Athlon 64 FX-60 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-6410 and Athlon 64 FX-60.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-6410 1.12
+149%
Athlon 64 FX-60 0.45

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-6410 1772
+150%
Athlon 64 FX-60 709

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.12 0.45
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 110 Watt

A8-6410 has a 148.9% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 633.3% lower power consumption.

The A8-6410 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 FX-60 in performance tests.

Be aware that A8-6410 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 FX-60 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-6410 and Athlon 64 FX-60, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-6410
A8-6410
AMD Athlon 64 FX-60
Athlon 64 FX-60

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 323 votes

Rate A8-6410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 10 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-6410 or Athlon 64 FX-60, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.