A4 PRO-3340B vs A8-6410

VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-6410
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.16
+8.4%

A8-6410 outperforms A4 PRO-3340B by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-6410 and A4 PRO-3340B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23902430
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency7.053.90
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date1 June 2014 (10 years ago)20 December 2014 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-6410 and A4 PRO-3340B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.2 GHz
L2 cache2048 KB2048 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
Number of transistors930 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A8-6410 and A4 PRO-3340B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT3bFT3
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-6410 and A4 PRO-3340B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4FMA4
AVX++
PowerNow++
PowerGating++
VirusProtect++
RAID-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-6410 and A4 PRO-3340B are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-6410 and A4 PRO-3340B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1866DDR3/DDR3L-1600
Max memory channels11

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 GraphicsAMD Radeon™ HD 8240 Graphics
iGPU core countno data2
Number of pipelinesno data128
Enduro++
Switchable graphics++
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-6410 and A4 PRO-3340B integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-6410 and A4 PRO-3340B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Vulkan++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-6410 and A4 PRO-3340B.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-6410 1.16
+8.4%
A4 PRO-3340B 1.07

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-6410 1772
+7.7%
A4 PRO-3340B 1645

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.16 1.07
Recency 1 June 2014 20 December 2014
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 25 Watt

A8-6410 has a 8.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

A4 PRO-3340B, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A8-6410 and A4 PRO-3340B.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-6410 and A4 PRO-3340B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-6410
A8-6410
AMD A4 PRO-3340B
A4 PRO-3340B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 322 votes

Rate A8-6410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate A4 PRO-3340B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-6410 or A4 PRO-3340B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.