A10-7400P vs A8-6410

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-6410
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.14

A10-7400P outperforms A8-6410 by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-6410 and A10-7400P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22882154
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD Kaveri
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date1 June 2014 (10 years ago)4 June 2014 (10 years ago)
Current price$334 $45

Detailed specifications

A8-6410 and A10-7400P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.4 GHz
L2 cache2048 KB4096 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data245 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C102 °C
Number of transistors930 Million2410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A8-6410 and A10-7400P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFT3bFP3
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-6410 and A10-7400P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1866 Controller
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4+
AVX++
FRTCno data1
PowerTune--
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow++
PowerGating++
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect++
RAIDno data-
HSAno data1

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-6410 and A10-7400P are enumerated here.

AMD-V11
IOMMU 2.0++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-6410 and A10-7400P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1866DDR3-1866
Max memory channels12

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R5 GraphicsAMD Radeon R6 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Number of pipelinesno data384
Enduro++
Switchable graphics11
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-6410 and A10-7400P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-6410 and A10-7400P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Vulkan11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-6410 and A10-7400P.

PCIe version2.03.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-6410 1.14
A10-7400P 1.34
+17.5%

A10-7400P outperforms A8-6410 by 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A8-6410 1767
A10-7400P 2078
+17.6%

A10-7400P outperforms A8-6410 by 18% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A8-6410 220
A10-7400P 320
+45.5%

A10-7400P outperforms A8-6410 by 45% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A8-6410 583
A10-7400P 696
+19.4%

A10-7400P outperforms A8-6410 by 19% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.14 1.34
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

The A10-7400P is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-6410 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-6410 and A10-7400P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-6410
A8-6410
AMD A10-7400P
A10-7400P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 306 votes

Rate A8-6410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 11 votes

Rate A10-7400P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-6410 or A10-7400P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.