Xeon E5-1603 vs A8-5500B

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-5500B
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.60
+14.5%

A8-5500B outperforms Xeon E5-1603 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-5500B and Xeon E5-1603 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17231815
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)no data
Release date2 October 2012 (11 years ago)1 January 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-5500B and Xeon E5-1603 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHzno data
Bus rateno data0 GT/s
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache0 KB10 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data64 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.6V - 1.35V

Compatibility

Information on A8-5500B and Xeon E5-1603 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-5500B and Xeon E5-1603. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX
AES-NI-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

A8-5500B and Xeon E5-1603 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-5500B and Xeon E5-1603 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-5500B and Xeon E5-1603. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-800, DDR3-1066
Maximum memory sizeno data375 GB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data31.4 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7560Dno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-5500B and Xeon E5-1603.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data40

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-5500B 2.60
+14.5%
Xeon E5-1603 2.27

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-5500B 3967
+14.6%
Xeon E5-1603 3463

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A8-5500B 391
Xeon E5-1603 466
+19.2%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A8-5500B 965
Xeon E5-1603 1474
+52.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.60 2.27
Recency 2 October 2012 1 January 2012
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 130 Watt

A8-5500B has a 14.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, and 100% lower power consumption.

The A8-5500B is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-1603 in performance tests.

Note that A8-5500B is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-1603 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-5500B and Xeon E5-1603, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-5500B
A8-5500B
Intel Xeon E5-1603
Xeon E5-1603

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 253 votes

Rate A8-5500B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 21 vote

Rate Xeon E5-1603 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-5500B or Xeon E5-1603, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.