Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U vs A8-4557M

VS

Primary details

Comparing A8-4557M and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated553
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiencyno data84.54
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Phoenix (Zen4) (2023)
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)23 May 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-4557M and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed1.9 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cacheno data384 KB
L2 cache4 MB6 MB
L3 cacheno data16 MB
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size246 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors1303 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A8-4557M and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGAno data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-4557M and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7640GAMD Radeon 760M

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 1.19 14.92
Recency 15 May 2012 23 May 2023
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U has 1153.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 11 years, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A8-4557M and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-4557M and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-4557M
A8-4557M
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate A8-4557M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-4557M or Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.