Athlon X2 QL-60 vs A8-4500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A8-4500M and Athlon X2 QL-60 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2315not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Series2x AMD Athlon
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Lion (2008−2009)
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)3 June 2008 (16 years ago)
Current price$179 $8.83

Detailed specifications

A8-4500M and Athlon X2 QL-60 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus supportno data3600 MHz
L1 cache192 KB256 KB
L2 cache4 MB (shared)1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A8-4500M and Athlon X2 QL-60 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1r2S1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-4500M and Athlon X2 QL-60. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
PowerNowno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-4500M and Athlon X2 QL-60 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-4500M and Athlon X2 QL-60. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknownno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7640Gno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A8-4500M 1679
+207%
Athlon X2 QL-60 547

A8-4500M outperforms Athlon X2 QL-60 by 207% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A8-4500M 1821
+43%
Athlon X2 QL-60 1273

A8-4500M outperforms Athlon X2 QL-60 by 43% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A8-4500M 4872
+73.8%
Athlon X2 QL-60 2803

A8-4500M outperforms Athlon X2 QL-60 by 74% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A8-4500M 2438
+80.3%
Athlon X2 QL-60 1352

A8-4500M outperforms Athlon X2 QL-60 by 80% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2012 3 June 2008
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm

We couldn't decide between A8-4500M and Athlon X2 QL-60. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-4500M and Athlon X2 QL-60, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-4500M
A8-4500M
AMD Athlon X2 QL-60
Athlon X2 QL-60

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 286 votes

Rate A8-4500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 32 votes

Rate Athlon X2 QL-60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-4500M or Athlon X2 QL-60, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.