Athlon X2 340 vs A8-4500M

VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-4500M
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.06
+29.3%
Athlon X2 340
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.82

A8-4500M outperforms Athlon X2 340 by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-4500M and Athlon X2 340 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24182584
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency2.871.19
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)2 October 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-4500M and Athlon X2 340 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.9 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache192 KB96K
L2 cache4 MB (shared)1 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A8-4500M and Athlon X2 340 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1r2FM2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-4500M and Athlon X2 340. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-4500M and Athlon X2 340 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-4500M and Athlon X2 340. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknownDDR3-1600

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7640G (496 - 685 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-4500M and Athlon X2 340.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-4500M 1.06
+29.3%
Athlon X2 340 0.82

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-4500M 1688
+29.2%
Athlon X2 340 1307

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A8-4500M 291
Athlon X2 340 300
+3.1%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A8-4500M 651
+54.3%
Athlon X2 340 422

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.06 0.82
Recency 15 May 2012 2 October 2012
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

A8-4500M has a 29.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

Athlon X2 340, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months.

The A8-4500M is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X2 340 in performance tests.

Be aware that A8-4500M is a notebook processor while Athlon X2 340 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-4500M and Athlon X2 340, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-4500M
A8-4500M
AMD Athlon X2 340
Athlon X2 340

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 317 votes

Rate A8-4500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 11 votes

Rate Athlon X2 340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-4500M or Athlon X2 340, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.