Xeon X3360 vs A8-3850

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-3850
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
1.37

Xeon X3360 outperforms A8-3850 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23942393
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesA-Series (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency0.580.61
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)no data
Release date30 June 2011 (14 years ago)1 January 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-3850 and Xeon X3360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads4no data
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.83 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHzno data
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache0 KB12 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size228 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on A8-3850 and Xeon X3360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFM1LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-3850 and Xeon X3360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

A8-3850 and Xeon X3360 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-3850 and Xeon X3360 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-3850 and Xeon X3360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6550Dno data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A8-3850 1.37
Xeon X3360 1.38
+0.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A8-3850 2421
Samples: 526
Xeon X3360 2424
+0.1%
Samples: 150

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A8-3850 318
Xeon X3360 417
+31.1%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A8-3850 914
Xeon X3360 1328
+45.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.37 1.38
Recency 30 June 2011 1 January 2008
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 95 Watt

A8-3850 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon X3360, on the other hand, has a 0.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 5.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between AMD A8-3850 and Intel Xeon X3360.

Note that A8-3850 is a desktop processor while Xeon X3360 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-3850
A8-3850
Intel Xeon X3360
Xeon X3360

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 183 votes

Rate A8-3850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 57 votes

Rate Xeon X3360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A8-3850 and Xeon X3360, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.