Xeon Gold 6348H vs A8-3850

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-3850
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
1.37
Xeon Gold 6348H
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 165 Watt
3.38
+147%

Xeon Gold 6348H outperforms A8-3850 by a whopping 147% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24201722
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesA-Series (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency1.472.20
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Cooper Lake-SP (2021)
Release date30 June 2011 (14 years ago)6 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-3850 and Xeon Gold 6348H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads448
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB33 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size228 mm2no data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A8-3850 and Xeon Gold 6348H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration14
SocketFM1FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-3850 and Xeon Gold 6348H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

A8-3850 and Xeon Gold 6348H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-3850 and Xeon Gold 6348H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-3850 and Xeon Gold 6348H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 RDIMM
Maximum memory sizeno data1.12 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6550Dno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-3850 and Xeon Gold 6348H.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A8-3850 1.37
Xeon Gold 6348H 3.38
+147%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A8-3850 2421
Samples: 527
Xeon Gold 6348H 5967
+146%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.37 3.38
Recency 30 June 2011 6 April 2021
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 48
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 165 Watt

A8-3850 has 65% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6348H, on the other hand, has a 146.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon Gold 6348H is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A8-3850 in performance tests.

Note that A8-3850 is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6348H is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-3850
A8-3850
Intel Xeon Gold 6348H
Xeon Gold 6348H

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 186 votes

Rate A8-3850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Xeon Gold 6348H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A8-3850 and Xeon Gold 6348H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.