A100 vs A8-3850

VS

Primary details

Comparing A8-3850 and A100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2144not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesA-Series (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency1.41no data
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Stealey (2007)
Release date30 June 2011 (13 years ago)June 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-3850 and A100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz0.6 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die size228 mm266 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 million176 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A8-3850 and A100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM1Intel BGA 437
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt3 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-3850 and A100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-3850 and A100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6550Dno data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 3 Watt

A8-3850 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.

A100, on the other hand, has 3233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A8-3850 and A100. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that A8-3850 is a desktop processor while A100 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-3850 and A100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-3850
A8-3850
Intel A100
A100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 176 votes

Rate A8-3850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate A100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-3850 or A100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.