3015e vs A8-3850

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-3850
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
1.53

3015e outperforms A8-3850 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-3850 and 3015e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20421938
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.77no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesA-Series (Desktop)AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Pollock (Zen)
Release date30 June 2011 (13 years ago)4 August 2020 (3 years ago)
Current price$38 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A8-3850 and 3015e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.9 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz2.3 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size228 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A8-3850 and 3015e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFM1FT5
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-3850 and 3015e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR4-1600 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NIno data+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-3850 and 3015e are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-3850 and 3015e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6550DAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-3850 1.53
3015e 1.75
+14.4%

3015e outperforms A8-3850 by 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A8-3850 2361
3015e 2714
+15%

3015e outperforms A8-3850 by 15% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A8-3850 320
3015e 523
+63.4%

3015e outperforms A8-3850 by 63% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A8-3850 933
3015e 982
+5.3%

3015e outperforms A8-3850 by 5% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.53 1.75
Integrated graphics card 1.04 2.98
Recency 30 June 2011 4 August 2020
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 6 Watt

The 3015e is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-3850 in performance tests.

Note that A8-3850 is a desktop processor while 3015e is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-3850 and 3015e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-3850
A8-3850
AMD 3015e
3015e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 170 votes

Rate A8-3850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 29 votes

Rate 3015e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-3850 or 3015e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.