E2-3200 vs A8-3820

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-3820
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.37
+125%
E2-3200
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.61

A8-3820 outperforms E2-3200 by a whopping 125% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-3820 and E2-3200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22412801
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.990.89
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date20 December 2011 (13 years ago)7 September 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-3820 and E2-3200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size228 mm2228 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A8-3820 and E2-3200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM1FM1
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-3820 and E2-3200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-3820 and E2-3200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6550DRadeon HD 6370D

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-3820 1.37
+125%
E2-3200 0.61

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-3820 2180
+125%
E2-3200 968

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A8-3820 304
+2%
E2-3200 298

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A8-3820 929
+77%
E2-3200 525

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.37 0.61
Recency 20 December 2011 7 September 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2

A8-3820 has a 124.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The A8-3820 is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-3200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-3820 and E2-3200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-3820
A8-3820
AMD E2-3200
E2-3200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 48 votes

Rate A8-3820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 23 votes

Rate E2-3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-3820 or E2-3200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.