Ryzen Threadripper 1920 vs A8-3800

VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-3800
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.29
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
2017
12 cores / 24 threads, 140 Watt
13.89
+977%

Ryzen Threadripper 1920 outperforms A8-3800 by a whopping 977% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-3800 and Ryzen Threadripper 1920 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2271529
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.889.39
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date30 June 2011 (13 years ago)29 July 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-3800 and Ryzen Threadripper 1920 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB32 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size228 mm2213 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 million9,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on A8-3800 and Ryzen Threadripper 1920 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM1SP3r2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt140 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-3800 and Ryzen Threadripper 1920. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-3800 and Ryzen Threadripper 1920 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-3800 and Ryzen Threadripper 1920. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Quad-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6550Dno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-3800 1.29
Ryzen Threadripper 1920 13.89
+977%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-3800 2049
Ryzen Threadripper 1920 22066
+977%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.29 13.89
Recency 30 June 2011 29 July 2017
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 140 Watt

A8-3800 has 115.4% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920, on the other hand, has a 976.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-3800 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-3800 and Ryzen Threadripper 1920, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-3800
A8-3800
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 69 votes

Rate A8-3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 22 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1920 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-3800 or Ryzen Threadripper 1920, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.