Ryzen 3 PRO 210 vs A8-3800
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 3 PRO 210 outperforms A8-3800 by a whopping 494% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2568 | 1188 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) |
| Power efficiency | 0.76 | 10.46 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Llano (2011−2012) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 30 June 2011 (14 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
A8-3800 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 228 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on A8-3800 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FM1 | FP7/FP7r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-3800 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-3800 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-3800 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6550D | AMD Radeon 740M ( - 2500 MHz) |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.16 | 6.89 |
| Integrated graphics card | 0.96 | 7.27 |
| Recency | 30 June 2011 | 6 January 2025 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 28 Watt |
Ryzen 3 PRO 210 has a 494% higher aggregate performance score, 657.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 13 years, 100% more threads, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 132.1% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 210 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A8-3800 in performance tests.
Note that A8-3800 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 PRO 210 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
