Processor N100 vs A8-3800

VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-3800
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.29
Processor N100
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
2.35
+82.2%

Processor N100 outperforms A8-3800 by an impressive 82% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-3800 and Processor N100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22731788
Place by popularitynot in top-10065
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency1.8837.07
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date30 June 2011 (13 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$128

Detailed specifications

A8-3800 and Processor N100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.4 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size228 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A8-3800 and Processor N100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM1Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-3800 and Processor N100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

A8-3800 and Processor N100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-3800 and Processor N100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-3800 and Processor N100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6550DIntel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-3800 and Processor N100.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.29 2.35
Integrated graphics card 1.04 2.32
Recency 30 June 2011 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 6 Watt

Processor N100 has a 82.2% higher aggregate performance score, 123.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 11 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 983.3% lower power consumption.

The Processor N100 is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-3800 in performance tests.

Note that A8-3800 is a desktop processor while Processor N100 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-3800 and Processor N100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-3800
A8-3800
Intel Processor N100
Processor N100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 70 votes

Rate A8-3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1261 vote

Rate Processor N100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-3800 or Processor N100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.