Pentium 3558U vs A8-3510MX
Aggregate performance score
A8-3510MX outperforms Pentium 3558U by an impressive 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing A8-3510MX and Pentium 3558U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2461 | 2771 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD A-Series | Intel Pentium |
| Power efficiency | 2.16 | 4.07 |
| Architecture codename | Llano (2011−2012) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| Release date | 14 June 2011 (13 years ago) | 1 January 2014 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $161 |
Detailed specifications
A8-3510MX and Pentium 3558U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 5 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 228 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on A8-3510MX and Pentium 3558U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FS1 | FCBGA1168 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-3510MX and Pentium 3558U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6620G | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-3510MX and Pentium 3558U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-3510MX and Pentium 3558U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon HD 6620G (444 MHz) | Intel HD Graphics (Haswell) (200 - 1000 MHz) |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.02 | 0.64 |
| Integrated graphics card | 0.89 | 0.85 |
| Recency | 14 June 2011 | 1 January 2014 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 15 Watt |
A8-3510MX has a 59.4% higher aggregate performance score, 4.7% faster integrated GPU, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Pentium 3558U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.
The A8-3510MX is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 3558U in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between A8-3510MX and Pentium 3558U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
