A6-4455M vs A8-3510MX

VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-3510MX
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
1.03
+106%
A6-4455M
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.50

A8-3510MX outperforms A6-4455M by a whopping 106% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-3510MX and A6-4455M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24562891
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD A-Series
Power efficiency2.172.78
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date14 June 2011 (13 years ago)15 May 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-3510MX and A6-4455M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)92 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size228 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data100 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A8-3510MX and A6-4455M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1FP2
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-3510MX and A6-4455M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6620G86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-3510MX and A6-4455M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-3510MX and A6-4455M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3unknown Dual-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6620G (444 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 7500G (327 - 424 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-3510MX 1.03
+106%
A6-4455M 0.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-3510MX 1631
+105%
A6-4455M 797

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A8-3510MX 233
+3.6%
A6-4455M 225

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A8-3510MX 631
+106%
A6-4455M 307

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A8-3510MX 6158
+137%
A6-4455M 2601

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.03 0.50
Integrated graphics card 0.88 0.83
Recency 14 June 2011 15 May 2012
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 17 Watt

A8-3510MX has a 106% higher aggregate performance score, 6% faster integrated GPU, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

A6-4455M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 164.7% lower power consumption.

The A8-3510MX is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-4455M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-3510MX and A6-4455M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-3510MX
A8-3510MX
AMD A6-4455M
A6-4455M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 42 votes

Rate A8-3510MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 44 votes

Rate A6-4455M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-3510MX or A6-4455M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.