Xeon E-2414 vs A8-3500M

VS

Primary details

Comparing A8-3500M and Xeon E-2414 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2562not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency2.38no data
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date14 June 2011 (13 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$225

Detailed specifications

A8-3500M and Xeon E-2414 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Performance-coresno data4
Threads44
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rateno data16 GT/s
L1 cache128 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size228 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A8-3500M and Xeon E-2414 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-3500M and Xeon E-2414. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6620GIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

A8-3500M and Xeon E-2414 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-3500M and Xeon E-2414 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-3500M and Xeon E-2414. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6620G (444 MHz)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-3500M and Xeon E-2414.

PCIe versionno data5
PCI Express lanesno data16

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 June 2011 14 December 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 55 Watt

A8-3500M has 57.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon E-2414, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years.

We couldn't decide between A8-3500M and Xeon E-2414. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A8-3500M is a notebook processor while Xeon E-2414 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-3500M and Xeon E-2414, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-3500M
A8-3500M
Intel Xeon E-2414
Xeon E-2414

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 118 votes

Rate A8-3500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E-2414 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-3500M or Xeon E-2414, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.