Athlon II X3 455 vs A8-3500M

VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-3500M
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.88
Athlon II X3 455
2010
3 cores / 3 threads, 95 Watt
1.18
+34.1%

Athlon II X3 455 outperforms A8-3500M by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-3500M and Athlon II X3 455 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25612365
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.52
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency2.381.17
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Rana (2009−2011)
Release date14 June 2011 (13 years ago)7 December 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$88

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A8-3500M and Athlon II X3 455 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)3 (Tri-Core)
Threads43
Base clock speed1.5 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size228 mm2169 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 million300 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A8-3500M and Athlon II X3 455 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1AM3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-3500M and Athlon II X3 455. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6620Gno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-3500M and Athlon II X3 455 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-3500M and Athlon II X3 455. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6620G (444 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-3500M and Athlon II X3 455.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-3500M 0.88
Athlon II X3 455 1.18
+34.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-3500M 1400
Athlon II X3 455 1879
+34.2%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A8-3500M 231
Athlon II X3 455 348
+50.6%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A8-3500M 620
Athlon II X3 455 855
+37.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.88 1.18
Recency 14 June 2011 7 December 2010
Physical cores 4 3
Threads 4 3
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 95 Watt

A8-3500M has an age advantage of 6 months, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

Athlon II X3 455, on the other hand, has a 34.1% higher aggregate performance score.

The Athlon II X3 455 is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-3500M in performance tests.

Be aware that A8-3500M is a notebook processor while Athlon II X3 455 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-3500M and Athlon II X3 455, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-3500M
A8-3500M
AMD Athlon II X3 455
Athlon II X3 455

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 118 votes

Rate A8-3500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 171 vote

Rate Athlon II X3 455 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-3500M or Athlon II X3 455, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.