Microsoft SQ1 vs A6-9500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

A6-9500
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
1.22

Microsoft SQ1 outperforms A6-9500 by a whopping 202% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-9500 and Microsoft SQ1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22451418
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.62no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataQualcomm Snapdragon
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019)
Release date27 July 2017 (6 years ago)2 October 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$64no data
Current price$36 (0.6x MSRP)$1873

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A6-9500 and Microsoft SQ1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed3.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3 GHz
L2 cache1024 KBno data
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A6-9500 and Microsoft SQ1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM4no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9500 and Microsoft SQ1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune+no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
VirusProtect+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9500 and Microsoft SQ1 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9500 and Microsoft SQ1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 GraphicsQualcomm Adreno 685
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-9500 and Microsoft SQ1 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-9500 and Microsoft SQ1 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9500 and Microsoft SQ1.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-9500 1.22
Microsoft SQ1 3.69
+202%

Microsoft SQ1 outperforms A6-9500 by 202% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A6-9500 1881
Microsoft SQ1 5704
+203%

Microsoft SQ1 outperforms A6-9500 by 203% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.22 3.69
Recency 27 July 2017 2 October 2019
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

The Microsoft SQ1 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-9500 in performance tests.

Note that A6-9500 is a desktop processor while Microsoft SQ1 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9500 and Microsoft SQ1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9500
A6-9500
Microsoft SQ1
SQ1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 176 votes

Rate A6-9500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 51 vote

Rate Microsoft SQ1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9500 or Microsoft SQ1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.