EPYC 8434PN vs A6-9500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2606not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.62no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency0.70no data
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Siena (2023−2024)
Release date27 July 2017 (8 years ago)18 September 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$64$3,150

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

A6-9500 and EPYC 8434PN basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads296
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm5 nm
Die size246 mm24x 73 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C85 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million35,500 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A6-9500 and EPYC 8434PN compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4SP6
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9500 and EPYC 8434PN. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9500 and EPYC 8434PN are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9500 and EPYC 8434PN. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR5
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 GraphicsN/A
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-9500 and EPYC 8434PN integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-9500 and EPYC 8434PN integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9500 and EPYC 8434PN.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes896

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 July 2017 18 September 2023
Physical cores 2 48
Threads 2 96
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 155 Watt

A6-9500 has 138.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC 8434PN, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between AMD A6-9500 and AMD EPYC 8434PN. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that A6-9500 is a desktop processor while EPYC 8434PN is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9500
A6-9500
AMD EPYC 8434PN
EPYC 8434PN

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 196 votes

Rate A6-9500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 8434PN on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A6-9500 and EPYC 8434PN, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.