Atom D425 vs A6-9500

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-9500
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
1.18
+808%
Atom D425
2010
1 core / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.13

A6-9500 outperforms Atom D425 by a whopping 808% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-9500 and Atom D425 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23683348
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.62no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency1.721.23
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Pineview (2009−2011)
Release date27 July 2017 (7 years ago)21 June 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$64$993

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A6-9500 and Atom D425 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz1.83 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size246 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million123 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-9500 and Atom D425 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9500 and Atom D425. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit

Security technologies

A6-9500 and Atom D425 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9500 and Atom D425 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9500 and Atom D425. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R5 GraphicsIntel GMA 3150
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-9500 and Atom D425 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-9500 and Atom D425 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9500 and Atom D425.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-9500 1.18
+808%
Atom D425 0.13

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-9500 1870
+817%
Atom D425 204

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.18 0.13
Recency 27 July 2017 21 June 2010
Physical cores 2 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 10 Watt

A6-9500 has a 807.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

Atom D425, on the other hand, has 550% lower power consumption.

The A6-9500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom D425 in performance tests.

Note that A6-9500 is a desktop processor while Atom D425 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9500 and Atom D425, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9500
A6-9500
Intel Atom D425
Atom D425

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 187 votes

Rate A6-9500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 63 votes

Rate Atom D425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9500 or Atom D425, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.