PRO A6-9500E vs A6-9400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-9400
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
1.54
+60.4%

A6-9400 outperforms PRO A6-9500E by an impressive 60% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23072696
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.011.17
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date16 March 2019 (6 years ago)3 October 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-9400 and PRO A6-9500E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache160Kno data
L2 cache1 MB (shared)1024 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size250 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors3,100 million3,100 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on A6-9400 and PRO A6-9500E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9400 and PRO A6-9500E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9400 and PRO A6-9500E are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9400 and PRO A6-9500E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4-2400
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon R5AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data4
Enduro-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-9400 and PRO A6-9500E integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-9400 and PRO A6-9500E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9400 and PRO A6-9500E.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes88

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A6-9400 1.54
+60.4%
PRO A6-9500E 0.96

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A6-9400 2717
+60.9%
Samples: 5
PRO A6-9500E 1689
Samples: 17

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.54 0.96
Recency 16 March 2019 3 October 2016
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

A6-9400 has a 60.4% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.

PRO A6-9500E, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

The AMD A6-9400 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD PRO A6-9500E in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9400
A6-9400
AMD PRO A6-9500E
PRO A6-9500E

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 26 votes

Rate A6-9400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate PRO A6-9500E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A6-9400 and PRO A6-9500E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.