EPYC 9654 vs A6-9400

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A6-9400
2019
2 cores / 2 threads
1.77
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads
79.71
+4403%

EPYC 9654 outperforms A6-9400 by 4403% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing A6-9400 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18974
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for moneyno data11.92
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Genoa
Release date16 March 2019 (5 years old)10 November 2022 (1 year old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,805
Current priceno data$3975 (0.3x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Technical specs

A6-9400 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)96
Threads2192
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache160K64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size250 mm212x 72 mm2
Number of transistors3,100 million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A6-9400 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9400 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9400 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9400 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon R5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9400 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes8128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-9400 1.77
EPYC 9654 79.71
+4403%

EPYC 9654 outperforms A6-9400 by 4403% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A6-9400 2717
EPYC 9654 122091
+4394%

EPYC 9654 outperforms A6-9400 by 4394% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.77 79.71
Recency 16 March 2019 10 November 2022
Physical cores 2 96
Threads 2 192
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-9400 in performance tests.

Be aware that A6-9400 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9400 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9400
A6-9400
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 15 votes

Rate AMD A6-9400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 978 votes

Rate AMD EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9400 or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.