3 305 vs A6-9400
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2362 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 1.01 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Wildcat Lake (2026) |
| Release date | 16 March 2019 (7 years ago) | 16 April 2026 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $309 |
Detailed specifications
A6-9400 and Core 3 305 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 160K | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (shared) | 2.5 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 250 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3,100 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on A6-9400 and Core 3 305 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | Intel BGA 1516 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9400 and Core 3 305. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
A6-9400 and Core 3 305 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9400 and Core 3 305 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9400 and Core 3 305. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Radeon R5 | Intel Xe3 Graphics (1 Xe) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9400 and Core 3 305.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | 6 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 16 March 2019 | 16 April 2026 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
| Threads | 2 | 6 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Core 3 305 has an age advantage of 7 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 833% more advanced lithography process, and 333% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD A6-9400 and Intel Core 3 305. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that A6-9400 is a desktop processor while Core 3 305 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
