Ryzen 3 5300G vs A6-9225

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-9225
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.87
Ryzen 3 5300G
2021
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
8.43
+869%

Ryzen 3 5300G outperforms A6-9225 by a whopping 869% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-9225 and Ryzen 3 5300G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2562918
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency5.2911.83
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Cezanne (2021−2024)
Release date1 June 2018 (6 years ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-9225 and Ryzen 3 5300G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed2.6 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz4.2 GHz
Multiplierno data40
L1 cache160 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data8 MB
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm
Die size124.5 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors1200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on A6-9225 and Ryzen 3 5300G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGAAM4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9225 and Ryzen 3 5300G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRANDno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9225 and Ryzen 3 5300G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9225 and Ryzen 3 5300G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-3200
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9225 and Ryzen 3 5300G.

PCIe versionno data4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-9225 0.87
Ryzen 3 5300G 8.43
+869%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-9225 1331
Ryzen 3 5300G 12902
+869%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A6-9225 271
Ryzen 3 5300G 1767
+552%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A6-9225 453
Ryzen 3 5300G 5478
+1109%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.87 8.43
Integrated graphics card 1.17 3.04
Recency 1 June 2018 13 April 2021
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

A6-9225 has 333.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 3 5300G, on the other hand, has a 869% higher aggregate performance score, 159.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 3 5300G is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-9225 in performance tests.

Be aware that A6-9225 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 3 5300G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9225 and Ryzen 3 5300G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9225
A6-9225
AMD Ryzen 3 5300G
Ryzen 3 5300G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2288 votes

Rate A6-9225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 104 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 5300G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9225 or Ryzen 3 5300G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.