Atom x7809C vs A6-9225 SoC
Primary details
Comparing A6-9225 SoC and Atom x7809C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) | Amston Lake (2024) |
Release date | April 2017 (7 years ago) | 8 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
A6-9225 SoC and Atom x7809C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 8 |
Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
L1 cache | 160 KB | 96 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB (shared) | 2 MB (per module) |
L3 cache | no data | 6 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | 125 mm2 | no data |
Number of transistors | 1,200 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on A6-9225 SoC and Atom x7809C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FT4 | Intel BGA 1264 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9225 SoC and Atom x7809C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9225 SoC and Atom x7809C are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9225 SoC and Atom x7809C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Radeon R4 3CU | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9225 SoC and Atom x7809C.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 8 | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
Threads | 2 | 8 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
A6-9225 SoC has 66.7% lower power consumption.
Atom x7809C, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between A6-9225 SoC and Atom x7809C. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9225 SoC and Atom x7809C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.