EPYC 9845 vs A6-9220e

VS

Primary details

Comparing A6-9220e and EPYC 9845 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2799not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency9.63no data
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Turin (2024)
Release date1 June 2017 (7 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$13,564

Detailed specifications

A6-9220e and EPYC 9845 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)160
Threads2320
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache160 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data320 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm3 nm
Die size124.5 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A6-9220e and EPYC 9845 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketBGASP5
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt390 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9220e and EPYC 9845. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9220e and EPYC 9845 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9220e and EPYC 9845. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9220e and EPYC 9845.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2017 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 160
Threads 2 320
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 390 Watt

A6-9220e has 6400% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9845, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 7900% more physical cores and 15900% more threads, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between A6-9220e and EPYC 9845. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A6-9220e is a notebook processor while EPYC 9845 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9220e and EPYC 9845, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9220e
A6-9220e
AMD EPYC 9845
EPYC 9845

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 316 votes

Rate A6-9220e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9845 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9220e or EPYC 9845, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.