Xeon 6325P vs A6-9220e SoC
Primary details
Comparing A6-9220e SoC and Xeon 6325P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 7 January 2019 (6 years ago) | 24 February 2025 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $281 |
Detailed specifications
A6-9220e SoC and Xeon 6325P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 160 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (shared) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 125 mm2 | 163 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on A6-9220e SoC and Xeon 6325P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FT4 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9220e SoC and Xeon 6325P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
A6-9220e SoC and Xeon 6325P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9220e SoC and Xeon 6325P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9220e SoC and Xeon 6325P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Radeon R4 3CU | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9220e SoC and Xeon 6325P.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 7 January 2019 | 24 February 2025 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 55 Watt |
A6-9220e SoC has 816.7% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6325P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD A6-9220e SoC and Intel Xeon 6325P. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that A6-9220e SoC is a notebook processor while Xeon 6325P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
