EPYC 9655P vs A6-9220 SoC

VS

Primary details

Comparing A6-9220 SoC and EPYC 9655P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.62
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiencyno data23.64
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Turin (2024)
Release dateApril 2017 (7 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$10,811

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A6-9220 SoC and EPYC 9655P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)96
Threads2192
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache160 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm4 nm
Die size125 mm212x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors1,200 million99,780 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on A6-9220 SoC and EPYC 9655P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9220 SoC and EPYC 9655P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9220 SoC and EPYC 9655P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9220 SoC and EPYC 9655P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon R4 3CUN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9220 SoC and EPYC 9655P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes8128

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 96
Threads 2 192
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 400 Watt

A6-9220 SoC has 2566.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9655P, on the other hand, has 4700% more physical cores and 9500% more threads, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between A6-9220 SoC and EPYC 9655P. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A6-9220 SoC is a notebook processor while EPYC 9655P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9220 SoC and EPYC 9655P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9220 SoC
A6-9220 SoC
AMD EPYC 9655P
EPYC 9655P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate A6-9220 SoC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 215 votes

Rate EPYC 9655P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9220 SoC or EPYC 9655P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.