Atom E3845 vs A6-9210

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-9210
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.79
+17.9%
Atom E3845
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.67

A6-9210 outperforms Atom E3845 by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-9210 and Atom E3845 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26342747
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAtom
Power efficiency4.996.34
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Bay Trail-I (2013)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)8 October 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-9210 and Atom E3845 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz1.91 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm22 nm
Die size124.5 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-9210 and Atom E3845 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4Intel BGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)10-15 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9210 and Atom E3845. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9210 and Atom E3845 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9210 and Atom E3845. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133DDR3
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R4 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics
iGPU core count3no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-9210 and Atom E3845 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-9210 and Atom E3845 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9210 and Atom E3845.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-9210 0.79
+17.9%
Atom E3845 0.67

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-9210 1248
+17.2%
Atom E3845 1065

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.79 0.67
Recency 1 June 2016 8 October 2013
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm

A6-9210 has a 17.9% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.

Atom E3845, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

The A6-9210 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom E3845 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9210 and Atom E3845, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9210
A6-9210
Intel Atom E3845
Atom E3845

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 151 vote

Rate A6-9210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 18 votes

Rate Atom E3845 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9210 or Atom E3845, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.