Opteron 844 vs A6-8500P
Primary details
Comparing A6-8500P and Opteron 844 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2525 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Server |
Series | AMD Carrizo | no data |
Power efficiency | 5.74 | no data |
Architecture codename | Carrizo (2015−2018) | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) |
Release date | 3 June 2015 (9 years ago) | June 2003 (21 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
A6-8500P and Opteron 844 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 130 nm |
Die size | no data | 193 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 3100 Million | 106 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on A6-8500P and Opteron 844 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 8 |
Socket | FP4 | 940 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 85 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-8500P and Opteron 844. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | HSA 1.0 | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
FMA | FMA4 | - |
AVX | AVX | - |
FRTC | + | - |
FreeSync | + | - |
TrueAudio | + | - |
PowerNow | + | - |
PowerGating | + | - |
Out-of-band client management | + | - |
VirusProtect | + | - |
HSA | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-8500P and Opteron 844 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-8500P and Opteron 844. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | Not Listed | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | no data |
iGPU core count | 4 | no data |
Enduro | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A6-8500P and Opteron 844 integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A6-8500P and Opteron 844 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-8500P and Opteron 844.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 130 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 85 Watt |
A6-8500P has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 466.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between A6-8500P and Opteron 844. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that A6-8500P is a notebook processor while Opteron 844 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A6-8500P and Opteron 844, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.