EPYC 9654 vs A6-7470K

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A6-7470K
2016
2 cores / 2 threads
1.16
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads
78.96
+6707%

EPYC 9654 outperforms A6-7470K by 6707% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing A6-7470K and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22454
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.0510.10
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2018)Genoa
Release date2 February 2016 (8 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,805
Current price$216 $4544 (0.4x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9654 has 20100% better value for money than A6-7470K.

Technical specs

A6-7470K and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)96
Threads2192
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache256 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size245 mm212x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on A6-7470K and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFM2+SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-7470K and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune+no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow-no data
PowerGating-no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect-no data
RAID-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-7470K and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-7470K and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count4no data
Number of pipelines256no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-7470K and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-7470K and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-7470K and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-7470K 1.16
EPYC 9654 78.96
+6707%

EPYC 9654 outperforms A6-7470K by 6707% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A6-7470K 1799
EPYC 9654 122091
+6687%

EPYC 9654 outperforms A6-7470K by 6687% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.16 78.96
Recency 2 February 2016 10 November 2022
Physical cores 2 96
Threads 2 192
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-7470K in performance tests.

Be aware that A6-7470K is a desktop processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-7470K and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-7470K
A6-7470K
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3 votes

Rate A6-7470K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 978 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-7470K or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.