Celeron 1007U vs A6-7400K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-7400K
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
1.03
+94.3%
Celeron 1007U
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.53

A6-7400K outperforms Celeron 1007U by an impressive 94% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-7400K and Celeron 1007U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24532867
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.502.95
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date31 July 2014 (10 years ago)20 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$86

Detailed specifications

A6-7400K and Celeron 1007U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
Multiplierno data15
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB512 KB
L3 cacheno data2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm22 nm
Die size245 mm2118 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C105 °C
Number of transistors2,411 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A6-7400K and Celeron 1007U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-7400K and Celeron 1007U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

A6-7400K and Celeron 1007U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-7400K and Celeron 1007U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-7400K and Celeron 1007U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R5 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors
iGPU core count4no data
จำนวนพาธไลน์256no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-7400K and Celeron 1007U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-7400K and Celeron 1007U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-7400K and Celeron 1007U.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-7400K 1.03
+94.3%
Celeron 1007U 0.53

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-7400K 1640
+95.2%
Celeron 1007U 840

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A6-7400K 398
+57.9%
Celeron 1007U 252

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A6-7400K 560
+32.7%
Celeron 1007U 422

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.03 0.53
Recency 31 July 2014 20 January 2013
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 17 Watt

A6-7400K has a 94.3% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

Celeron 1007U, on the other hand, has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 282.4% lower power consumption.

The A6-7400K is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 1007U in performance tests.

Note that A6-7400K is a desktop processor while Celeron 1007U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-7400K and Celeron 1007U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-7400K
A6-7400K
Intel Celeron 1007U
Celeron 1007U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 84 votes

Rate A6-7400K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 126 votes

Rate Celeron 1007U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-7400K or Celeron 1007U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.