Apple M4 Max (14 cores) vs A6-7400K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-7400K
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.95
Apple M4 Max (14 cores)
2024
14 cores / 14 threads, 4 Watt
21.81
+2196%

M4 Max (14 cores) outperforms A6-7400K by a whopping 2196% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2717304
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M4
Power efficiency1.57no data
DesignerAMDApple
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)no data
Release date31 July 2014 (11 years ago)30 November 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-7400K and M4 Max (14 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads214
Base clock speed3.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4.51 GHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache1024 KBno data
Chip lithography28 nm3 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 millionno data
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A6-7400K and M4 Max (14 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFM2+no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt4 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-7400K and M4 Max (14 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-7400K and M4 Max (14 cores) are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-7400K and M4 Max (14 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 GraphicsApple M4 32-core GPU
iGPU core count4no data
จำนวนพาธไลน์256no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-7400K and M4 Max (14 cores) integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-7400K and M4 Max (14 cores) integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-7400K and M4 Max (14 cores).

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A6-7400K 0.95
Apple M4 Max (14 cores) 21.81
+2196%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A6-7400K 1676
Samples: 358
Apple M4 Max (14 cores) 38534
+2199%
Samples: 233

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.95 21.81
Recency 31 July 2014 30 November 2024
Physical cores 2 14
Threads 2 14
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 4 Watt

Apple M4 Max (14 cores) has a 2195.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 600% more physical cores and 600% more threads, a 833.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1525% lower power consumption.

The Apple M4 Max (14 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A6-7400K in performance tests.

Note that A6-7400K is a desktop processor while Apple M4 Max (14 cores) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-7400K
A6-7400K
Apple M4 Max (14 cores)
M4 Max (14 cores)

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 92 votes

Rate A6-7400K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 76 votes

Rate M4 Max (14 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A6-7400K and M4 Max (14 cores), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.