Xeon X5450 vs A6-7310
Aggregate performance score
A6-7310 outperforms Xeon X5450 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing A6-7310 and Xeon X5450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 1990 | 2081 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Server |
Series | AMD A-Series | no data |
Architecture codename | Carrizo-L (2015) | no data |
Release date | 7 May 2015 (9 years ago) | 1 October 2007 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A6-7310 and Xeon X5450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | no data |
Threads | 4 | no data |
Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | no data |
L1 cache | 256 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 2 MB | no data |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | 63 °C |
Number of transistors | 930 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on A6-7310 and Xeon X5450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | FP4 BGA | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 12-25 Watt | 120 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-7310 and Xeon X5450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT | no data |
AES-NI | + | no data |
AVX | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R4 (Beema) | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.74 | 1.54 |
Recency | 7 May 2015 | 1 October 2007 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 120 Watt |
A6-7310 has a 13% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and 900% lower power consumption.
The A6-7310 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5450 in performance tests.
Be aware that A6-7310 is a notebook processor while Xeon X5450 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A6-7310 and Xeon X5450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.