Xeon E-2314 vs A6-7310

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-7310
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.69
Xeon E-2314
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
5.13
+204%

Xeon E-2314 outperforms A6-7310 by a whopping 204% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-7310 and Xeon E-2314 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20481200
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency6.407.47
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)Rocket Lake-E (2021)
Release date7 May 2015 (9 years ago)8 September 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-7310 and Xeon E-2314 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors930 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on A6-7310 and Xeon E-2314 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)12-25 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-7310 and Xeon E-2314. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

A6-7310 and Xeon E-2314 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-7310 and Xeon E-2314 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-7310 and Xeon E-2314. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1866DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channels12
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R4 Graphicsno data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-7310 and Xeon E-2314 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-7310 and Xeon E-2314 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-7310 and Xeon E-2314.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data44

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-7310 1.69
Xeon E-2314 5.13
+204%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-7310 2689
Xeon E-2314 8146
+203%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A6-7310 228
Xeon E-2314 1660
+628%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A6-7310 591
Xeon E-2314 4218
+614%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.69 5.13
Recency 7 May 2015 8 September 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 65 Watt

A6-7310 has 441.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon E-2314, on the other hand, has a 203.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon E-2314 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-7310 in performance tests.

Be aware that A6-7310 is a notebook processor while Xeon E-2314 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-7310 and Xeon E-2314, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-7310
A6-7310
Intel Xeon E-2314
Xeon E-2314

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 510 votes

Rate A6-7310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 7 votes

Rate Xeon E-2314 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-7310 or Xeon E-2314, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.